“Beyond the CIA Triad: The 9 Point Core Security Principles Star Versus The CIA Triad
For Better Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies.”
By Jim West

Helps senior leadership with a visual representation of how their mission goals align with their
organizations security projects and efforts.
Helps auditors and assessors provide better understanding on how to mitigate via defense in depth
and more precisely accommodate for weaknesses.
Helps organizations develop their strategy to align security plans and projects with their current
mission as well as their vision.
Everyday risk is identified, mitigated, transferred, accepted, or (in a worst case scenario) ignored.
What is apparent in today’s ever changing world of cyber security is that risk is not something to be
taken lightly. Getting senior leadership’s understanding of risk, the security professional’s valuation of
risk, and the mitigation actions completed is all part of the never ending risk negotiation. Currently
many security professionals speak of how the CIA triad plays a part in the management of risk, but
lacks the details of considering all aspects of risk. This triad only takes into consideration the factors
of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This does not consider the other 6 core security principles
of Utility, Authentication, Authorized Use, Privacy, Possession, and Non-Repudiation. The nine (total)
core security principles are needed to fully address risk in more detail than this triad allows.
According to The Official (ISC)2® Guide to the ISSMP® CBK®: “The traditional information security
triad consists of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Confidentiality is the protection against the
risk of unauthorized disclosure; integrity is the protection against unauthorized modification; and
availability is the protection against the risk of denial of service. Don Parker then added possession,
utility, and authenticity. Possession is the protection against the risk of loss of theft; utility is the
protection against the loss of the ability to use for the intended purpose; and authenticity is the
protection against the risk of not conforming to reality. Nonrepudiation, authorized use, and privacy
round out the nine core principles. Nonrepudiation is the protection against the risk of deniability;
authorized use is the protection against the risk of unauthorized use of cost incurring services; and
privacy is the protection against the risk of disclosing personal information.” (Tipton, Litchko, Hennell,
Lang 136).


When all 9 core security principles are brought into the picture it provides a more detailed
understanding of how technologies align to the principles protecting the organization’s goals. This
visual representation allows security professionals to understand what technologies are available and
how they can be used to mitigate risks in regards to the identified core security principle.

There is correlation between opposite points on the star. This does not show direct opposites in
security, but rather to display how certain technologies are not directly involved in mitigation of
certain core principles. Example: Your organization is in the defense sector and confidentiality is at
the top of its mission’s goals. As certain confidential information gets leaked to the public (more
available) then confidentiality is compromised. Another example is that Denial of Service (or DoS)
attacks would target the Availability and Utility sections of the star. This does not directly mean a
compromise in Integrity or Confidentiality. So again the example of Confidentiality and Availability are
just one example of how a weakness in one area could undermine another, but this is not always the
case where there is still room for risk negotiation to occur.
From an auditors perspective, measuring risk should account for factors such as current security
measures/countermeasures employed, the configuration of security enabled devices, risk response,
security plans, procedures, and user awareness. When an auditor identifies a weakness they can
easily align it to the core principle and provide a more detailed recommendation to leadership on the
options available to mitigate the weakness(es). If the auditor’s rationale was a lower risk, it is better
to align such a rationale with the core principle and related technologies to better explain the
rationale than simply stating ‘defense in depth’. Defense in depth now can be visually applied to risk
Once leadership begins to employ the 9 point star in their risk management process(es), they can
assign values from a typical risk appetite chart to the star. An organization can then list out in detail
which core security principles they are willing to accept risk on, and those related technologies

associated with the principle. Example: A company has a requirement for high data availability (non-
sensitive data), so they would seek out technologies around Availability & Utility. After a quick cost

benefit analysis the company determines that they simply cannot afford their own SAN, but with the
newer technology of cloud computing they could possibly leverage a third party contract that
provides them with the Availability required and the solution was driven by the relation of the core

Now the trick question; how do all of these core principles come together? They appear in user
awareness, technical training, security plans, policies, and procedures. Granted, new turn key
technologies alleviate a great deal of the workload, but without proper training on how to deploy,
configure, utilize, and maintain these technologies their effectiveness is only as good as the level of
user’s training. With all of the technical tools in place, users still pose a risk through insider threats,
and data leaks. This is where reviewing Authorized Use and Availability of data in regards to the
organization’s Confidentiality goals are key. These are further broken down by common security
concepts like the separation of duties, least privileged, and job rotation methodologies. These are
aligned to the 9 point star, and help address threats once they have been identified.
The 9 point core security principles star will help many organizations seek out possible solutions to
risks, while auditors detail what is lacking in an organization’s ability to achieve its security goals, and
finally provide senior leadership a more detailed visualization of what principles are acceptable risk
and which ones are not. The goal is to provide a new perspective to support risk management and
it’s never ending negotiation.